How did it come to be taught as a normative part of the language?ĮDIT: What led me to ask this question is an extreme example from an article on the pathologization of informal speech. In particular, I wonder whether it was invented (consciously or otherwise) as a class marker or to pathologize certain groups. Naturally, this leads me to wonder where the rule came from. To me, the “rule” against sentence fragments resembles the “rule” against beginning a sentence with a conjunction or ending one with a preposition in that the “rule” is violated continually and comprehensively in actual usage, both spoken and written, both in everyday communication and in the great works of the English-language canon. But this seems to clearly be a value judgement about correctness rather than a mere stylistic tip. Of course, it's perfectly reasonable from a linguistics standpoint to observe a distinction between sentences that meet certain criteria and sentences that do not. I understand this to a typical and generally accepted part of English education. I was always taught that a “complete sentence” required a subject and a predicate and that a “sentence fragment” lacking one of those elements was somehow defective or incorrect. I was born in 1987 and attended public school in a liberal area of the United States. or more) in a linguistic subject or related, send us a mod mail. If you suspect a question is one of homework, please answer as generally as possible - giving tips rather than answers.īefore you post, consider using the search bar and the FAQ page to see if your question has already received a satisfactory answer. It is fine to ask for tips or for feedback on your methodology so far. Homework questions are permitted as long as you state your understanding so far and don't expect anyone to answer your questions for you. Transphobia, homophobia, racism, ableism, and any other discriminatory content will result in deletion and/or a ban.ĥ- Follow all site-wide rules and terms of service. Insulting or harassing others will result in deletion and/or a ban. "Informed" means those answering should be mindful of stating limitations to their own knowledge or understanding. Answers without explanation will be removed or locked (and/or prompted to provide an explanation). This can take the form of academic sources, stated personal experience (eg, of the language/s in question), and similar. "High-quality" means that answers should provide an explanation/justification. *Repeated posting of the same/similar question.Ģ- Answers must be informed, relevant and high-quality. Questions should seek to learn or understand, not push an agenda. Post to r/grammar or a language subreddit. *Questions of basic grammaticality/common usage. See r/whatstheword or a language subreddit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |